Lever pricing 2024: what does it cost you

These are the latest pricing indications for Lever, a leader in the Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) market.

Lever pricing 2024: what does it cost you

Disclosure: some links in this article are affiliate links. If you sign up through one, HeroHunt may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Lever is an Applicant Tracking System (ATS) used by companies from small teams up to large enterprises to set up their hiring funnel and manage candidates and their candidate experience.

Lever has no publicly available pricing on their website so we wrote this guide for you so you can better understand what it could cost you.

We don’t attempt to give the exact pricing because pricing can vary per individual organization, but we do give indications on what the pricing can look like based on market data and on Lever’s own contract documents.

We'll answer these questions for you:

  • Who owns Lever now?
  • Which Lever plans are there?
  • What does Lever cost?
  • What is not in the subscription price?
  • When should I pay for Lever?
  • What are alternatives to Lever?

Who owns Lever now?

Worth knowing before you sign anything: Lever is not an independent company any more. Employ Inc. acquired Lever in August 2022. Employ also owns Jobvite, JazzHR and NXTThing RPO, so a single vendor now sells three ATSs into overlapping markets: JazzHR at the SMB end, Lever in the mid-market, Jobvite at enterprise. Employ reported more than 18,000 customers across the group after the deal closed.

This matters commercially rather than emotionally. Your Lever contract is Employ paper (the product addendum still names Jobvite in places), and roadmap investment is spread across a portfolio instead of one product. It is a fair question to put to the sales rep: which of your three ATSs are you steering me toward, and why.

Which Lever plans are there?

Lever sells two packages: LeverTRM and LeverTRM for Enterprise. Neither carries a published price, and there is no standardized plan, so quotes vary significantly per organization and negotiation influences the final number.

LeverTRM is the core product: the ATS plus Lever’s CRM and Nurture email campaigns (including the Rediscovery Engine that resurfaces past candidates), a custom careers page, EEO data collection and reporting, social referrals, internal candidates, the Chrome sourcing extension, an agency portal and up to five email domains.

LeverTRM for Enterprise adds what larger hiring orgs actually run on: requisition management, posting and offer approvals, headcount restrictions (no offer without an open req), the Automation Hub with auto-screening, confidential postings, Slackbot, e-signature integrations, custom jobsite analytics, up to ten email domains and single sign-on.

That last one catches buyers out. SSO sits in the Enterprise tier, not the core one, so if your security team mandates SSO then the entry package is not really on the table and your budget conversation starts higher than you planned. Lever does sell an Advanced HR add-on that bolts requisition management and approvals onto plain LeverTRM, which is the middle path when you need reqs but not the whole Enterprise package.

What does Lever cost?

The most important thing to understand about Lever pricing is the meter, and almost nobody tells you this part.

Lever does not price per recruiter seat. It prices on your total company headcount.

That is not a rumour, it is in the contract. Employ’s Lever Product Description Addendum defines “Employee Limit” as “the total number of employees employed by Customer at the time of the Order Form Effective Date”, and defines the billable “Quantity” as that same Employee Limit.

So a 300-person company with two recruiters and a 40-person startup with two recruiters are not close to each other on price. You are billed on the 300.

That is also why every Lever pricing estimate you find online is banded by company size. Based on Vendr’s transaction data across 318 Lever purchases:

Company sizeTypical annual contract
Under 100 employeesLower to mid five figures
100 to 500 employeesMid to upper five figures
500+ employeesOften six figures
Median, all sizes~$15,400 per year

Different companies get different quotes, and negotiation has proven to help. Buyers in that data set took an average of 16% off the opening proposal. Vendr also reports 15-30% lower effective annual pricing on multi-year commitments and 15-25% off when a competing ATS is visibly in the evaluation. Discounting is expected here, so treat the first number as an opening position, not a price.

Highlight

Manatal

Against a median near $15,400 a year, the meter matters more than the discount you win. Lever bills on Employee Limit, your total company headcount, so people you hire outside recruiting still raise the bill. Manatal bills the opposite way and publishes the number: $15 per user per month billed annually ($19 month to month), so three recruiters is three seats whether the company is 30 people or 300. Two honest caveats before treating that as like for like. The $15 tier caps at 15 active jobs and 10,000 candidates, so above 15 live reqs your real comparison is the $35 per user tier. And if you shortlisted Lever for Nurture and the Rediscovery Engine on long-cycle passive pipelines, Manatal has no serious equivalent. Its 14-day trial takes no credit card, though, and Lever has neither a trial nor a free tier, so you can price one before a sales call and not the other.

Start free on Manatal

What is not in the subscription price?

Three clauses are worth reading before you sign.

Implementation and data migration are quoted separately. Lever sells onboarding as packages and runs data migration in defined tiers, both priced apart from the subscription. None of it is free, and it is the line item most often traded away in a negotiation, so ask for it explicitly.

The renewal increase is capped at CPI plus 5%. The addendum caps a renewal uplift at the change in US CPI over the preceding twelve months plus five percent. That is a genuine protection and better than an uncapped renewal, but do the arithmetic: at 3% CPI it still allows an 8% rise for the identical product. If your order form does not reference the cap, ask why not.

Growing headcount can raise your price mid-contract. On multi-year terms, Lever assesses your actual employee volume at each anniversary. Headcount above your agreed Employee Limit counts as “Excess Use”, and Lever may apply a prorated price increase that is invoiced automatically. Read that again if you are scaling: on a three-year Lever deal, hiring well is what raises your ATS bill, even if your req count never moves. Negotiate the Employee Limit to where you expect to be, not where you are today.

One exception to the headcount meter: add-ons such as Advanced Analytics and Candidate Texting are priced per seat, not on the Employee Limit.

When should I pay for Lever?

Lever is worth the money when relationship-led recruiting is the actual job: long cycles on passive candidates, talent pools you nurture for months, a team that sources rather than waits for applicants. The CRM and Nurture half is what Lever genuinely does better than most ATSs, and it is what the TRM in the name is there for.

Lever is a poor fit when you are applicant-driven and headcount-heavy. Because the meter is total employees, a 400-person manufacturer making 15 hires a year pays like a 400-person company while using the product like a 15-hire company. That is the worst-value shape for Lever and it is a common one.

There is no free tier and no free trial, so evaluating Lever means a sales call and an annual commitment either way. Also consider your alternatives though. There are similar solutions in the market which might better suit your business. 

A headcount-metered quote versus a published per-seat price: worth costing both out before the Lever call.

Start free on Manatal

What alternatives do I have?

If you’re not sure Lever is the best choice, there are enough other ATS solutions you can consider.

The useful axis is not the feature list, it is how each vendor meters you and whether it will tell you the price at all:

ATSWhat you are billed onPrice published?
LeverTotal company headcountNo, quote only
ManatalPer user seatYes: $15/user/mo annual ($19 monthly), capped at 15 jobs and 10,000 candidates. Enterprise $35, Enterprise Plus $55 adds SSO and open API
WorkableEmployee-count bandsYes: from $299/mo (1-20 employees)
GreenhouseEmployee countNo, quote only
iCIMSEmployee countNo, quote only
JobviteEmployee countNo, quote only (same owner as Lever)

Two things fall out of that table. First, if your recruiting team is small relative to your company, a seat-metered ATS like Manatal is structurally cheaper than a headcount-metered one, and the gap widens every time you hire someone outside of recruiting. Second, if you want Lever specifically for Nurture, the seat-metered options are not really substitutes, and the honest comparison is Lever against Greenhouse or Jobvite, where you will be collecting quotes rather than reading prices.