If you are here for the number, here it is. Posting a job on Torre is free. The paid products are priced separately: Torre OS, the ATS and CRM, starts at $99 per user/month. Torre Reach, the AI sourcing product, has no list price: you set a daily budget. Torre Pro is $4.99/month. That is everything Torre publishes on its own pricing page, checked 16 July 2026.

Now a correction, and it applies to an earlier version of this page. There is a set of Torre.ai "pricing tiers" circulating the web: a $199 Starter plan, a $499 Professional plan, a per-action credit system, and $1,000-$5,000 implementation fees. None of that appears anywhere on Torre's pricing page, and we cannot source a single figure in it. We have removed it. If you find those numbers quoted elsewhere, treat them as unverified, because several sites (including, previously, this one) have been citing each other rather than Torre.

What Torre.ai actually charges

Torre does not sell one product with good-better-best tiers. It sells four things, and they are priced on four different logics. This is the whole published menu:

Two things follow from that table, and they matter more than any tier chart.

First, Torre's cheap entry point is real. You can post a role and hire from the applicants without paying Torre anything. That is unusual, and it is the honest headline of this page.

Second, the number you will actually be quoted is not on the page. "Starting at $99" and "set your daily budget" are both openings for a sales conversation, not prices. Which brings us to the part Torre does not publish.

Torre OS: $99 per user/month, and what "starting at" hides

Torre OS is the piece that competes with a normal ATS. Torre pitches it as a CRM and applicant tracking system with AI matching, candidate acquisition across multiple channels, AI screening, video screening questions, reference checks, funnel analytics, and API and MCP endpoints for developers.

Torre's own marketing claims around it are specific: 9 types of AI, 112 matching factors, and a database of 1+ billion candidates reachable across 15+ channels. Read those as vendor claims, because that is what they are. Torre publishes no methodology behind them, and no third party has verified them.

The pricing caveat is the phrase "starting at." $99 per user/month is a floor, not a quote. Torre publishes no tier table above it, no seat minimum, no annual-versus-monthly discount, and no contract length. At $99 per seat, a five-recruiter team is looking at roughly $5,940 per year before anything Torre chooses to charge on top. There is a free trial ("try it out for free"), but Torre does not publish its length.

That $99 floor is worth holding next to what the rest of the ATS market publishes, because plenty of it publishes a full price without a call.

Torre Reach: the daily budget question

Reach is the product Torre is really built around, and it is the one with no published rate. You set a daily budget, and Emma sources against it.

Torre describes the loop plainly enough: you give the job criteria, Emma shares the opening across job boards and communities, identifies matches from the 1+ billion database, messages some of them (depending on your budget), and sends daily reports until you stop it. That parenthetical is the pricing model. Your budget buys outreach volume.

Torre claims Reach delivers up to 20x more matching professionals and that clients report up to 84% savings on recruitment costs. Both are Torre's numbers, both are "up to," and neither is independently verified. Treat them as the ceiling of a sales pitch.

Because there is no rate card, the burden is on you to pin one down before you spend. Ask Torre these directly:

• Minimum daily budget, and the minimum term you must run it for
• What one unit of spend buys: is it per message sent, per candidate sourced, per application delivered, or a flat daily rate?
• Who counts as a delivered candidate, and whether you pay for candidates who never reply
• Whether Reach requires Torre OS at $99 per seat, or runs standalone on a free job post
• What happens to your budget on a role that does not fill

Get those in writing. A budget-based sourcing product with no published rate is not automatically expensive, but it is automatically hard to compare, and that is a real cost of evaluating Torre.

The free tier is the actual story

Most vendor pricing pages bury the free option. Torre leads with it: post a job, hire directly or through a third party, pay Torre nothing.

If you are a startup filling one or two roles, this is a genuinely low-risk way to test Torre's candidate pool. You are trading money for effort: without Reach, nobody is doing outbound for you, and without Torre OS you are managing the pipeline yourself. For two hires a year, that trade is usually correct.

The free tier is also how you should evaluate the paid ones. Post a real role for free first. If Torre's inbound applicants are good, Reach becomes a reasonable bet on more of the same. If they are not, no daily budget is going to fix the underlying match quality, and you have learned that for $0.

What it costs to not solve this

The reason any of this pricing is tolerable is that the alternative is worse. SHRM's benchmarking puts the average cost per hire at nearly $4,700 - SHRM, and its 2025 benchmarking reports put non-executive cost per hire at $5,475 and executive hires at $35,879 - SHRM.

Set that against contingency agency fees, which commonly run 15% to 25% of first-year salary (higher for executive search). On a $120,000 role, a 20% fee is $24,000 for one hire. Against that, $99 per seat per month is not the expensive part of your hiring budget, and it is not close.

What we are not going to do is hand you a tidy "Torre saves you 47%" table. We cannot verify Torre's outcome claims, and the arithmetic only works if you already know your fill rate on the platform, which you will not until you have run the free tier.

Who Torre is priced for, and who it is not

Torre fits if you are hiring remote roles (Torre's pool skews heavily to remote and to Latin America), you want to test a candidate pool without a contract, or you want outbound sourcing run as a managed budget rather than as a seat you have to staff.

Torre is a poor fit if you need a predictable line item you can put in a budget before you talk to a salesperson. Between "starting at $99" and "set your daily budget," Torre publishes almost nothing you can forecast against. It is also a poor fit if you need enterprise procurement artifacts, since nothing about SSO, security review, contract terms, or seat minimums is public.

The bottom line

Torre's pricing is genuinely cheap at the entry point and genuinely opaque above it. Free job posting is real and worth using. $99 per user/month for Torre OS is competitive for what it bundles, but it is a floor with no published ceiling. Reach could be the best money you spend or an open tap, and Torre's public materials do not let you tell which in advance.

If raw affordability and a price you can read off a page are what you are optimising for, a lower-cost ATS like Manatal is worth a look before you book a Torre demo. If AI outbound sourcing is the actual job to be done, Torre Reach has no real equivalent at the low end, and the daily-budget model is worth the sales call, but price it against sourcing tools that publish a rate before you commit to an open tap.

Either way, do this in order: post one real role on the free tier, judge the applicants, and only then ask about a budget. Any vendor whose price starts with "starting at" is quoting you, not pricing itself.

Questions to bring to the demo

Torre's published pricing leaves four gaps. Close them before you commit:

1. What is above $99? Ask for the full Torre OS tier list, seat minimums, and whether annual billing discounts it.
2. What does the Reach budget buy? Get the unit of spend in writing (per message, per candidate, per application, or flat daily).
3. How long is the free trial, and does it include Reach or only Torre OS?
4. Is Torre OS required for Reach? The pricing page sells them separately. Confirm they work that way.

If a vendor will not answer those four in an email, that tells you something about what the contract will feel like.